diff options
| author | Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> | 2020-09-03 10:39:34 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> | 2020-09-03 10:39:34 -0700 |
| commit | 51bcd74123ffe1cb78d9f70043e3e91591023e7d (patch) | |
| tree | 0e05ad5d9e3d2c8b4330ee11fb30659901195b45 | |
| parent | a4d8a919cb65bf5c8cec06e1cd8bec0f0fa4cdfc (diff) | |
| download | wiki-51bcd74123ffe1cb78d9f70043e3e91591023e7d.tar.gz | |
new version of first paragraph of research page
| -rw-r--r-- | philos/research.mdwn | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/philos/research.mdwn b/philos/research.mdwn index dcdfa56..bb6a331 100644 --- a/philos/research.mdwn +++ b/philos/research.mdwn @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -In my research I aim to develop and defend a eudaimonist virtue ethics, both -against other approaches in normative ethics, and against non-eudaimonist -forms of virtue ethics. Eudaimonism is characterised by the ideas that only -living virtuously is unconditionally good, that other things are good only -relative to living virtuously, and that it is a mistake to sharply distinguish -living well, living ethically and living happily. Non-eudaimonist virtue -ethics are those which reject one or more of these ideas but still give virtue -theoretical centrality, such as consequentialist virtue ethics. +In my research, I am to develop and defend a eudaimonist virtue ethics, both +against other approaches in normative ethics and against non-eudaimonist forms +of virtue ethics. Eudaimonism is characterised by the ideas that only living +virtuously is unconditionally good, that other things are good only relative +to living virtuously, and that it is a mistake to sharply distinguish living +well, living ethically and living happily. Non-eudaimonist virtue ethics +(such as consequentialist virtue ethics) are those which reject one or more of +these ideas, while still giving virtue theoretical centrality. # Articles |