|author||Sean Whitton <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2018-09-27 13:13:08 -0700|
|committer||Sean Whitton <email@example.com>||2018-09-27 13:13:08 -0700|
reword and expand
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/blog/entry/aristotledndalignments.mdwn b/blog/entry/aristotledndalignments.mdwn
index 9f1051d..d0442d6 100644
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ Aristotle's distinction in *EN* between brutishness and vice might be
comparable to the distinction in *Dungeons & Dragons* between chaotic
evil and lawful evil, respectively.
-I've always thought that lawful evil characters are ultimately more
-threatening than chaotic evil characters. In the *Critical Hit*
+I've always thought that the forces of lawful evil are more deeply
+threatening than those of chaotic evil. In the *Critical Hit*
podcast, lawful evil is equated with tyranny.
+Of course, at least how I run it, Aristotelian ethics involves no
+notion of evil, only mistakes about the good.