diff options
| author | Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> | 2019-05-03 14:19:26 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> | 2019-05-03 14:54:38 -0700 |
| commit | b5376e0ebd7b62f00c1b64aef87cd8d96cfbc71a (patch) | |
| tree | 4c549292720246066a8d6ea72d6810b2fdc5d701 /Makefile.in | |
| parent | dae48faec640bba57a42c1a81cc0ab6703a2ddbd (diff) | |
| download | emacs-b5376e0ebd7b62f00c1b64aef87cd8d96cfbc71a.tar.gz | |
Skip tests if test subdir is missing
Problem reported by Jeffrey Walton in:
https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2019-05/msg00041.html
* Makefile.in (CHECK_TARGETS): New macro; use it
to simplify 'check' and similar rules.
($(CHECK_TARGETS)): If tests are missing, do not fail
after issuing a diagnostic. Just skip the tests.
Diffstat (limited to 'Makefile.in')
| -rw-r--r-- | Makefile.in | 18 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in index 06da415a4ab..21362a91963 100644 --- a/Makefile.in +++ b/Makefile.in @@ -950,17 +950,15 @@ extraclean: $(extraclean_dirs:=_extraclean) TAGS tags: lib lib-src # src $(MAKE) -C src tags -.PHONY: have-tests -have-tests: - @if test ! -d test; then \ - echo "You do not seem to have the test/ directory."; \ - echo "Maybe you are using a release tarfile, rather than a repository checkout."; \ - exit 1; \ - fi - -.PHONY: check check-maybe check-expensive check-all -check check-maybe check-expensive check-all: have-tests all +CHECK_TARGETS = check check-maybe check-expensive check-all +.PHONY: $(CHECK_TARGETS) +$(CHECK_TARGETS): all +ifeq ($(wildcard test),test) $(MAKE) -C test $@ +else + @echo "You do not seem to have the test/ directory." + @echo "Maybe you used a release tarfile that lacks tests." +endif dist: cd ${srcdir}; ./make-dist |