summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/admin/notes/years
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGlenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>2007-01-16 03:54:37 +0000
committerGlenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>2007-01-16 03:54:37 +0000
commit631e2c0f553fe0976ca7847381026300aa315375 (patch)
treeebff7eb477e4b3b3ef890a6fdc351b4cea966256 /admin/notes/years
parentb3d90e4611747fe8aa17c2e3e8895b8749276712 (diff)
downloademacs-631e2c0f553fe0976ca7847381026300aa315375.tar.gz
*** empty log message ***
Diffstat (limited to 'admin/notes/years')
-rw-r--r--admin/notes/years15
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/admin/notes/years b/admin/notes/years
index 155ccd6f065..7000f0942c1 100644
--- a/admin/notes/years
+++ b/admin/notes/years
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ How to Maintain Copyright Years for GNU Emacs
"Our lawyer says it is ok if we add, to each file that has been in Emacs
- since Emacs 21 came out in 2001, all the subsequent years. We don't
+ since Emacs 21 came out in 2001, all the subsequent years[1]. We don't
need to check whether *that file* was changed in those years.
It's sufficient that *Emacs* was changed in those years (and it was!).
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ How to Maintain Copyright Years for GNU Emacs
--RMS, 2005-07-13
+[1] Note that this includes 2001 - see
+<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2006-12/msg00119.html>
+
For the refcards under etc/, it's ok to simply use the latest year
(typically in a `\def\year{YEAR}' expression) for the rendered copyright
@@ -18,6 +21,16 @@ notice, while maintaining the full list of years in the copyright notice
in the comments.
+Please fix or report any non-trivial files that have "odd" copyright
+notices. This includes missing copyright notices, and copyright
+holders other than FSF (or AIST in some cases). In most cases,
+individual authors should not appear in copyright statements. Either
+the copyright has been assigned (check copyright.list) to the FSF (in
+which case the original author should be removed and the year(s)
+transferred to the FSF); or else it is possible the file should not be
+in Emacs at all (please report!).
+
+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------