diff options
author | Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> | 2021-10-27 14:33:42 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> | 2021-10-27 14:33:42 +0300 |
commit | d353fc4a005472f6ac4ac3d530cee18a51c00243 (patch) | |
tree | 8a1a441ee7914f6db9ca9646f13c3e282a14ba5c /doc/lispintro | |
parent | 47a3750162b9e7015d96c60d7fa979876f0e63f4 (diff) | |
download | emacs-d353fc4a005472f6ac4ac3d530cee18a51c00243.tar.gz |
; Explain why "kinds of atom" isn't a typo
* doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi (Lisp Atoms): Add a comment
explaining why "kinds of atom" isn't a typo.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/lispintro')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi index 6ecd552ebb0..391b6d9c590 100644 --- a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi +++ b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi @@ -1162,6 +1162,10 @@ computer. Often, people use the term @dfn{expression} indiscriminately. (Also, in many texts, the word @dfn{form} is used as a synonym for expression.) +@c This and the next paragraph say ``kinds of atom'', but that is not +@c a typo, just slightly ``old-fashioned wording which adds a fillip +@c of interest to it'', and ``is more elegant writing'', according to +@c RMS. Incidentally, the atoms that make up our universe were named such when they were thought to be indivisible; but it has been found that physical atoms are not indivisible. Parts can split off an atom or it can |