More small edits for doc/lispref

* control.texi: Where possible, use example rather than smallexample.
(Sequencing, Conditionals, Signaling Errors, Handling Errors):
Tweak page breaks.

* customize.texi: Where possible, use example rather than smallexample.
(Common Keywords, Variable Definitions, Applying Customizations)
(Custom Themes): Tweak page breaks.

* eval.texi, functions.texi, loading.texi, macros.texi:
Where possible, use example rather than smallexample.

* sequences.texi (Arrays): Tweak page breaks.

* symbols.texi: Where possible, use example rather than smallexample.
(Symbol Components): Fix typo.
(Other Plists): Tweak page break.

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 19 deletions

diff --git a/doc/lispref/macros.texi b/doc/lispref/macros.texi
index b87e9f228f3..5cdcfae1e50 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/macros.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/macros.texi
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 @c -*-texinfo-*-
 @c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
-@c Copyright (C) 1990-1995, 1998, 2001-2012  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+@c Copyright (C) 1990-1995, 1998, 2001-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 @c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
 @setfilename ../../info/macros
 @node Macros, Customization, Functions, Top
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ If @var{environment} is provided, it specifies an alist of macro
 definitions that shadow the currently defined macros.  Byte compilation
 uses this feature.
 
-@smallexample
+@example
 @group
 (defmacro inc (var)
     (list 'setq var (list '1+ var)))
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ uses this feature.
 (macroexpand '(inc2 r s))
      @result{} (progn (inc r) (inc s))  ; @r{@code{inc} not expanded here.}
 @end group
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 @end defun
 
 
@@ -146,10 +146,10 @@ Repeating the example used for @code{macroexpand} above with
 @code{macroexpand-all}, we see that @code{macroexpand-all} @emph{does}
 expand the embedded calls to @code{inc}:
 
-@smallexample
+@example
 (macroexpand-all '(inc2 r s))
      @result{} (progn (setq r (1+ r)) (setq s (1+ s)))
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 
 @end defun
 
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ following macro (used to facilitate iteration) illustrates the
 problem.  This macro allows us to write a ``for'' loop construct.
 
 @findex for
-@smallexample
+@example
 @group
 (defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body)
   "Execute a simple \"for\" loop.
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ For example, (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))."
      @print{}3       9
 @result{} nil
 @end group
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 
 @noindent
 The arguments @code{from}, @code{to}, and @code{do} in this macro are
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ in those positions in the macro call.
 
 Here's an equivalent definition simplified through use of backquote:
 
-@smallexample
+@example
 @group
 (defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body)
   "Execute a simple \"for\" loop.
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ For example, (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))."
        ,@@body
        (inc ,var))))
 @end group
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 
 Both forms of this definition (with backquote and without) suffer from
 the defect that @var{final} is evaluated on every iteration.  If
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ producing an expansion that evaluates the argument expressions exactly
 once unless repeated evaluation is part of the intended purpose of the
 macro.  Here is a correct expansion for the @code{for} macro:
 
-@smallexample
+@example
 @group
 (let ((i 1)
       (max 3))
@@ -408,11 +408,11 @@ macro.  Here is a correct expansion for the @code{for} macro:
     (princ (format "%d      %d" i square))
     (inc i)))
 @end group
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 
 Here is a macro definition that creates this expansion:
 
-@smallexample
+@example
 @group
 (defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body)
   "Execute a simple for loop: (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))."
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ Here is a macro definition that creates this expansion:
        ,@@body
        (inc ,var))))
 @end group
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 
   Unfortunately, this fix introduces another problem,
 described in the following section.
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ described in the following section.
 follows to make the expansion evaluate the macro arguments the proper
 number of times:
 
-@smallexample
+@example
 @group
 (defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body)
   "Execute a simple for loop: (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))."
@@ -447,14 +447,14 @@ number of times:
        ,@@body
        (inc ,var))))
 @end group
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 @end ifnottex
 
   The new definition of @code{for} has a new problem: it introduces a
 local variable named @code{max} which the user does not expect.  This
 causes trouble in examples such as the following:
 
-@smallexample
+@example
 @group
 (let ((max 0))
   (for x from 0 to 10 do
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ causes trouble in examples such as the following:
       (if (< max this)
           (setq max this)))))
 @end group
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 
 @noindent
 The references to @code{max} inside the body of the @code{for}, which
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ put it into the program later.  It will never appear anywhere except
 where put by @code{for}.  Here is a definition of @code{for} that works
 this way:
 
-@smallexample
+@example
 @group
 (defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body)
   "Execute a simple for loop: (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))."
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ this way:
          ,@@body
          (inc ,var)))))
 @end group
-@end smallexample
+@end example
 
 @noindent
 This creates an uninterned symbol named @code{max} and puts it in the