summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lisp/eshell/eshell.el
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>2021-09-14 07:55:56 +0200
committerStefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>2021-09-14 07:57:14 +0200
commit25ebb9374bdadf66153727831fc7ff131c8cf299 (patch)
tree7ed04a5efe70f4f6e66118aebd9ccee12275d6bf /lisp/eshell/eshell.el
parentcf2fa6c87f4da4665ff8a9e8e220bba0b5bccefc (diff)
downloademacs-25ebb9374bdadf66153727831fc7ff131c8cf299.tar.gz
; More minor docfixes found by checkdoc
Diffstat (limited to 'lisp/eshell/eshell.el')
-rw-r--r--lisp/eshell/eshell.el10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/lisp/eshell/eshell.el b/lisp/eshell/eshell.el
index 101ac860346..35153675faa 100644
--- a/lisp/eshell/eshell.el
+++ b/lisp/eshell/eshell.el
@@ -33,15 +33,15 @@
;; @ A high degree of configurability
;;
;; @ The ability to have the same shell on every system Emacs has been
-;; ported to. Since Eshell imposes no external requirements, and
+;; ported to. Since Eshell imposes no external requirements, and
;; relies upon only the Lisp functions exposed by Emacs, it is quite
-;; operating system independent. Several of the common UNIX
+;; operating system independent. Several of the common UNIX
;; commands, such as ls, mv, rm, ln, etc., have been implemented in
;; Lisp in order to provide a more consistent work environment.
;;
;; For those who might be using an older version of Eshell, version
-;; 2.1 represents an entirely new, module-based architecture. It
-;; supports most of the features offered by modern shells. Here is a
+;; 2.1 represents an entirely new, module-based architecture. It
+;; supports most of the features offered by modern shells. Here is a
;; brief list of some of its more visible features:
;;
;; @ Command argument completion (tcsh, zsh)
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
;; errors, such as 'dri' for `dir'. Since executing non-existent
;; programs is rarely the intention of the user, eshell could prompt
;; for the replacement string, and then record that in a database of
-;; known misspellings. (Note: The typo at the beginning of this
+;; known misspellings. (Note: The typo at the beginning of this
;; paragraph wasn't discovered until two months after I wrote the
;; text; it was not intentional).
;;